Heltz v. Barratt

Full title: Mary T. HELTZ, Appellant, v. Bruce S. BARRATT et al., Respondents.

Court: Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Dec 17, 2014

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8791 (N.Y. 2014)

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8791

3 N.Y.S.3d 757

27 N.E.3d 471

Opinion

12-17-2014

Mary T. HELTZ, Appellant, v. Bruce S. BARRATT et al., Respondents.

Personius Melber LLP, Buffalo (Scott R. Hapeman of counsel), for appellant. Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Andrew J. Kowalewski of counsel), for respondents.

Personius Melber LLP, Buffalo (Scott R. Hapeman of counsel), for appellant.

Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Andrew J. Kowalewski of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to produce admissible evidence raising a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Barratt had an opportunity to avoid the collision.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.