From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helm v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1947
273 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

December 31, 1947.

Present — Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.


Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We conclude that facts sufficient to state a cause of action are alleged in the first cause of action in plaintiff's complaint. It is unnecessary, therefore, to pass upon the second cause of action ( Eidlits v. Fischback Moore, Inc., 239 A D 483, 486). All concur. (The order denies defendant's motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action in plaintiff's complaint in an action to recover the balance of a judgment secured by plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.)


Summaries of

Helm v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1947
273 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Helm v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH HELM, Respondent, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1947

Citations

273 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Ferrare

between the parties; (b). Interfering with the relationship between the sponsors and their customers by…

Debby Junior Coat & Suit Co. v. Wollman Mills

While the warranties were made by and to different parties, they are otherwise identical in fact and in law…