explaining that a medical malpractice screening panel evaluates only the alleged misconduct of healthcare providers and concluding that certified nursing assistants did not meet the definition because they are not professional licensees subject to the Act
Summary of this case from Simmons v. ClineNo. 93,681.
September 23, 2005.
Appeal from Bourbon.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
explaining that a medical malpractice screening panel evaluates only the alleged misconduct of healthcare providers and concluding that certified nursing assistants did not meet the definition because they are not professional licensees subject to the Act
Summary of this case from Simmons v. ClineFull title:HEIRS OF WEBBER v. SCHMIDT
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Sep 23, 2005
“[A] medical malpractice cause of action is a condition precedent to convening a medical malpractice…
Simmons v. ClineThe Act establishes a mechanism by which the court may convene a screening panel on Kansas medical…