From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heinlen v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of California
May 31, 1884
65 Cal. 304 (Cal. 1884)

Opinion

         MOTION to dismiss appeal.

         COUNSEL:

         Bennett & Wigginton, for Appellant.

         G. A. Heinlen, and Atwell & Bradley, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

         THE COURT.

         The notice of appeal was given September 9, 1882. On the 1st of April, 1884, the plaintiff (respondent) moved that the appeal be dismissed, on the ground that no transcript had been filed in this court. Time was given to appellant to file affidavits showing why the transcript had not been filed. The time given having expired, and no affidavits having been filed, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed. A transcript was filed after the motion was made, but no reason appears why it was not filed before. Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Heinlen v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of California
May 31, 1884
65 Cal. 304 (Cal. 1884)
Case details for

Heinlen v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HEINLEN, RESPONDENT, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 31, 1884

Citations

65 Cal. 304 (Cal. 1884)
4 P. 15

Citing Cases

Va. St. Fidelco, L.L.C. v. Orbis Prods. Corp.

(Id.) These communications suggest that William may have been a decision-maker regarding environmental issues…

Proctor v. Educational Credit Management Corp.

Between April and August of 2003, prior to the adoption of the Trust, HEAF assigned three of Proctor's loans…