From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hebble v. Hebble

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 885 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided May 17th, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J. Eq. 53.

Mr. Frank R. Pentlarge, for the respondent.

Messrs. McDermott, Enright Carpenter, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Hebble v. Hebble

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 885 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Hebble v. Hebble

Case Details

Full title:MARY V. HEBBLE, respondent, v. AMOS S. HEBBLE, appellant

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 17, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 885 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Turi v. Turi

" It may be noted, in passing, that the observation made in Dietrick that the amount allowed the wife is…

Testut v. Testut

The obligation to support that family is paramount and the extent of the obligation measured in dollars is…