From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heavner v. Clarke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

May, 1930.


Order granting plaintiff's motion for a stay and denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion for stay denied, without costs, and motion to dismiss complaint granted, with ten dollars costs. Under section 40 of the Surrogate's Court Act, as amended by chapter 439 of the Laws of 1921 and chapter 100 of the Laws of 1924, the Surrogate's Court is given jurisdiction to determine whether or not the general release given by the plaintiff to the defendant was obtained by fraud. ( Matter of Cook, 244 N.Y. 63; Matter of Malcomson, 188 App. Div. 600; Matter of Raymond v. Davis, 248 N.Y. 67.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heavner v. Clarke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Heavner v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE R. HEAVNER, Respondent, v. MINNIE C. CLARKE, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Matter of Sand

One of the issues presented in this proceeding is whether the release correctly states the intent of the…

Matter of Meyer

The theory on which he seeks a construction was properly held by the Surrogate not to be cognizable in that…