From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Healy v. Hourigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1950
276 App. Div. 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

April 3, 1950.


In an action to recover a deposit paid by plaintiff pursuant to a written contract, order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, striking out the defenses, and dismissing the counterclaim of defendant Hourigan, and judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendants, affirmed, with a single bill of $10 costs and disbursements to plaintiff against defendants. No opinion. Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Nolan, P.J., dissents and votes to reverse the order, to deny the motion for summary judgment, and to vacate the judgment, on the ground that issues of fact are presented, and such issues should not be determined on affidavits.


Summaries of

Healy v. Hourigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1950
276 App. Div. 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Healy v. Hourigan

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND F. HEALY, Respondent, v. EDMOND HOURIGAN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1950

Citations

276 App. Div. 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Kasen v. Morrell

In our opinion the allegations in the first cause of action do not require a determination that an agreement…