From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Head v. Emblem Health

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 5, 2017
156 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

5132 Index 161536/14

12-05-2017

Margot HEAD, etc. Plaintiff–Appellant, v. EMBLEM HEALTH, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Law Offices of David L. Trueman, P.C., New York (David L. Trueman of counsel), for appellant. Christian & Barton, LLP, Richmond, VA (Henry I. Willett, III of the bar of the State of Virginia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for respondents.


Law Offices of David L. Trueman, P.C., New York (David L. Trueman of counsel), for appellant.

Christian & Barton, LLP, Richmond, VA (Henry I. Willett, III of the bar of the State of Virginia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for respondents.

Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Andrias, Kern, Singh, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered October 11, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants' motion to dismiss the causes of action for fraud and bad faith breach of insurance contract, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In support of the fraud causes of action, the complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to establish the element of a material misrepresentation (see Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 N.Y.3d 553, 559, 883 N.Y.S.2d 147, 910 N.E.2d 976 [2009] ). While the Attorney General's investigation documented numerous instances of defendants' misconduct, contrary to plaintiff's contention, it did not detail instances of fraud. Plaintiff's allegation that defendants entered into the insurance contract with an undisclosed intention not to perform in accordance with the contract's terms is insufficient to establish a misrepresentation or a material omission (see New York Univ. v. Continental Ins. Co., 87 N.Y.2d 308, 318, 639 N.Y.S.2d 283, 662 N.E.2d 763 [1995] ). The fraud causes of action were correctly dismissed as duplicative of the breach of contract cause of action (see Coppola v. Applied Elec. Corp., 288 A.D.2d 41, 42, 732 N.Y.S.2d 402 [1st Dept. 2001] ).

There is no independent cause of action for bad faith breach of insurance contract arising from an insurer's failure to perform its obligations under an insurance contract (see Orient Overseas Assoc. v. XL Ins. Am., Inc., 132 A.D.3d 574, 18 N.Y.S.3d 381 [1st Dept. 2015] ; McGowan v. Great N. Ins. Co., 78 A.D.3d 1137, 911 N.Y.S.2d 663 [2d Dept. 2010] ).


Summaries of

Head v. Emblem Health

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 5, 2017
156 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Head v. Emblem Health

Case Details

Full title:Margot HEAD, etc. Plaintiff–Appellant, v. EMBLEM HEALTH, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 5, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 8483
64 N.Y.S.3d 518

Citing Cases

ETC Ne. Pipeline, LLC v. Associated Elec. & Gas Ins. Servs.

(quoting Woodhams, 748 F.Supp.2d at 223)); Violet Realty, Inc. v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 267 F.Supp.3d 384,…

Tanchez v. Combe Inc.

"Although there is certainly no requirement of unassailable proof at the pleading stage, the complaint must…