From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.C. BAXTER BRO. v. GREAT ATLANTIC PAC. TEA

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Oct 29, 1965
352 F.2d 87 (1st Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 6516.

Heard October 6, 1965.

Decided October 29, 1965.

W. Brown Morton, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom W. Brown Morton, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Wescott, Portland, Me., McLean, Morton Boustead, Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor Adams, Washington, D.C., and Drummond Wescott, Portland, Me., were on brief, for appellants.

Nicholas John Stathis, New York City, with whom William B. Mahoney, Portland, Me., John T. Kelton, Elmer R. Helferich and Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton Taggart, New York City, were on brief, for appellee.

Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, HAMLIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and McENTEE, Circuit Judge.

Sitting by designation.


This is an appeal from a finding of invalidity of a process patent for pretreating French fried potatoes so they will fry to a substantially even color. The facts and an extensive discussion are found in the opinion of the district court, 236 F. Supp. 601. Without deciding whether the evidence justified a conclusion that the patent claims in suit are invalid because wholly inoperative, we think the evidence supports the court's holding that they are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 because of the extent of experimentation required of one skilled in the art in order to ascertain their "teaching."

Affirmed.


Summaries of

H.C. BAXTER BRO. v. GREAT ATLANTIC PAC. TEA

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Oct 29, 1965
352 F.2d 87 (1st Cir. 1965)
Case details for

H.C. BAXTER BRO. v. GREAT ATLANTIC PAC. TEA

Case Details

Full title:H.C. BAXTER BRO., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. The GREAT ATLANTIC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Date published: Oct 29, 1965

Citations

352 F.2d 87 (1st Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

H. C. Baxter and Bro. v. Great Atlantic & P. Tea Co., Inc.

After a protracted trial the Court held that the patent claims in suit were invalid for inoperativeness and…

Gross v. General Motors Corp.

While testing may not be required where the teaching is simple and compelling to those skilled in the art…