From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haytko v. William Crabb Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Sep 16, 1952
21 N.J. Super. 330 (App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

Argued September 8, 1952 —

Decided September 16, 1952.

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Toner, Crowley Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).

Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.


We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Francis and reported in 17 N.J. Super. 95 ( Co. Ct., Law Div., 1951).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Haytko v. William Crabb Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Sep 16, 1952
21 N.J. Super. 330 (App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Haytko v. William Crabb Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM CRABB AND CO.…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Sep 16, 1952

Citations

21 N.J. Super. 330 (App. Div. 1952)
91 A.2d 231

Citing Cases

Malloy v. Capitol Bakery

The burden of proving that the employment was casual rests upon the employer. Burdick v. Liberty Motor…

Graham v. Green

Mueller v. Oelkers Mfg. Co., 36N.J.L.J. 117 ( C.P. 1913); Schaeffer v. De Grottola, 85 N.J.L. 444 ( Sup. Ct.…