From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. Cain

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 4, 2002
284 F.3d 604 (5th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

No. 00-31012.

March 4, 2002.

Henry Clay Walker (argued), Walker, Tooke Lyons, Shreveport, LA, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Catherine M. Estopinal, Asst. Dist. Atty. (argued), Shreveport, LA, for Respondent-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Donald E. Walter, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Nov. 27, 2001, 5 Cir., 2001, 272 F.3d 757)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Haynes v. Cain

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 4, 2002
284 F.3d 604 (5th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

Haynes v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:Brandon HAYNES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 4, 2002

Citations

284 F.3d 604 (5th Cir. 2002)

Citing Cases

United States v. Self

See U.S. v. Hamilton, 792 F.2d 837 (9th Cir.1986). “The sixth amendment does not require counsel to invent a…

Fuqua v. Unknown Party

, rehr'g granted on other grounds, 284 F.3d 604 (5th Cir. 2002).…