From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haydo v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jun 3, 2014
CASE NO. 13-cv-05347 RJB (W.D. Wash. Jun. 3, 2014)

Summary

holding that the law of the case doctrine did not apply in part because the ALJ "treat[ed] this evidence differently" in the current ALJ decision than in the previous ALJ decision

Summary of this case from Michael H. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

CASE NO. 13-cv-05347 RJB

06-03-2014

CHRISTOPHER J. HAYDO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Judge J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation and this matter is AFFIRMED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
(2) The Clerk is directed to enter JUDGMENT for defendant and the case should be closed. and
(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel of record.

__________

ROBERT J. BRYAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Haydo v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jun 3, 2014
CASE NO. 13-cv-05347 RJB (W.D. Wash. Jun. 3, 2014)

holding that the law of the case doctrine did not apply in part because the ALJ "treat[ed] this evidence differently" in the current ALJ decision than in the previous ALJ decision

Summary of this case from Michael H. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Haydo v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER J. HAYDO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Jun 3, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 13-cv-05347 RJB (W.D. Wash. Jun. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Berryhill

Case law from this district suggests that when an ALJ gives new or different reasons to discount evidence on…

Michael H. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Because the ALJ in the current decision employed a different assessment of Dr. Cheng's opinion than was…