From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haxhaj v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1867.

December 22, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered May 5, 2008, which granted the motion of defendant Central Park Conservancy (CPC) to set aside the verdict, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Law Offices of Kenneth A. Wilhelm, New York (Rory Shectman of counsel), for appellants.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan Paulson of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


Plaintiffs were unable to show that defendant City, whose duty to maintain its roads and highways in a reasonably safe condition is nondelegable ( see Lopes v Rostad, 45 NY2d 617, 623; McAllen v City of New York, 270 AD2d 43), had prior written notice of the alleged defect in the pathway (Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c]), or that either defendant had created the defect through its own affirmative negligence. They further failed to demonstrate that any circumstances exist under which CPC, a contractor, could have owed a duty of care to them ( see Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs., 98 NY2d 136, 138). The agreement between the defendants did not indicate that CPC assumed any duty of the City to maintain the premises in a safe condition.

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

[Prior Case History: 19 Misc 3d 1135(A), 2008 NY Slip Op 51009(U).]


Summaries of

Haxhaj v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Haxhaj v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ZARAH HAXHAJ, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, YASMIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9519
892 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

Goregliad v. Friends of the High Line, Inc.

persons may sometimes be appropriate," the Espinal court established three exceptions to the general rule:…

Brunero v. City of N.Y.

" Under the Agreement, the Conservancy is required to provide specified maintenance services in Central Park…