From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. Household Finance Corporation of Decatur

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 9, 1976
229 S.E.2d 13 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Summary

In Household Fin., supra, the complaint showed on its face that the interest and the finance fee were excessively computed as a result of the mistake.

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Commercial Credit Plan

Opinion

52495.

ARGUED JULY 13, 1976.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 9, 1976.

Action on note. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Mitchell.

Richard D. Ellenberg, for appellants.

Harris Bullock, for appellee.


This case is an appeal from a judgment denying appellants' motion to set aside a default judgment based on the ground that the loan contract violated the provisions of Code Ann. § 25-319 (Ga. L. 1955, pp. 431, 444) in failing to disclose the amount of insurance sold them. Held:

The Code section requires disclosure of "the amount of each class of insurance carried and the premiums paid thereon." Examination of the contract reveals the premium charged, but not the amount of insurance. The case is controlled by the decisions of this court and our Supreme Court in Patman v. General Finance Corp., 128 Ga. App. 836 ( 198 S.E.2d 371) and Moore v. American Finance System, 236 Ga. 610 ( 225 S.E.2d 17).

Judgment reversed. Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.


ARGUED JULY 13, 1976 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 9, 1976.


Summaries of

Hawkins v. Household Finance Corporation of Decatur

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 9, 1976
229 S.E.2d 13 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

In Household Fin., supra, the complaint showed on its face that the interest and the finance fee were excessively computed as a result of the mistake.

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Commercial Credit Plan
Case details for

Hawkins v. Household Finance Corporation of Decatur

Case Details

Full title:HAWKINS et al. v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF DECATUR

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 9, 1976

Citations

229 S.E.2d 13 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
229 S.E.2d 13

Citing Cases

Jenkins v. Commercial Credit Plan

Thus, Moore, supra, is substantially factually distinguishable; moreover, charging a usurious rate of…

Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Mason

"At the time the loan is made, each licensee hereunder shall deliver to the borrower, or if there be two or…