From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawke-Dingman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 29, 2012
Case No. 11-CV-15493 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-CV-15493

10-29-2012

TRACIE HAWKE-DINGMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH


ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #16),

GRANTING IN PART THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #11), DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT(DOC. #13), AND REMANDING ACTION

Before the court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, which were referred to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. On September 11, 2012, Magistrate Judge Laurie Michelson issued her report, recommending that the court grant in part the plaintiff's pro se motion for summary judgment, deny the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and remand the matter for further administrative proceedings, for the purpose of considering new evidence produced by the plaintiff pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The magistrate judge specifically stated that any objections to her report must be filed within 14 days of service, and that failure to file such objections constituted a waiver of any further right of appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). No such objections were filed by either party.

The court has reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, finds it to be well-reasoned, and hereby adopts the result recommended therein. The court hereby construes plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in part as a motion for remand; the relief therein requested by plaintiff is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent plaintiff seeks consideration of her evidence of continued hospitalizations. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED and this cause of action is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The court retains jurisdiction over the action pending further agency action. See Marshall v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 444 F.3d 837, 841 (6th Cir. 2006).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


On October 29, 2012, copies of this Order were served upon

attorneys of record and on Tracie Hawke-Dingman,

351 N. Squirrel Road #187, Auburn Hills, MI 48326

by electronic and/or ordinary mail.


Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Hawke-Dingman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 29, 2012
Case No. 11-CV-15493 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Hawke-Dingman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:TRACIE HAWKE-DINGMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 29, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-CV-15493 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Pettry v. Colvin

As one court has observed, "[i]t is far from plain that a person requiring hospitalization as frequently as…

Minke v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Id. at *4. Similarly, in Hawke-Dingman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 2012 WL 5328674 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 11, 2012),…