From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haugen v. Marshall

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division
Sep 22, 2010
Case No. CV 09-8044-ODW (MLG) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CV 09-8044-ODW (MLG).

September 22, 2010


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and all of the records herein, including the Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendations to which objections were filed.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Court accept and adopt the Report and Recommendation, (2) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED, and (3) Judgment be entered granting the petition and ordering that the California Board of Parole Hearings credit Petitioner's parole period for the time he spent in confinement that was in violation of his due process rights.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on all parties.

Dated: September 21, 2010


Summaries of

Haugen v. Marshall

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division
Sep 22, 2010
Case No. CV 09-8044-ODW (MLG) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Haugen v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD HAUGEN, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Sep 22, 2010

Citations

Case No. CV 09-8044-ODW (MLG) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

State v. Tanner

In order to reduce recidivism, a parolee's contact with other felons often is restricted. See, e.g., Mayo v.…