From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haugen v. Armour Co.

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Mar 29, 1938
280 N.W. 204 (N.D. 1938)

Opinion

File No. 6519.

Opinion filed March 29, 1938.

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, Englert, J.

Affirmed.

Fuller Powers, for appellant.

Goodwin T. Westlund and Conmy Conmy, for respondent.


The issues in this case are similar to those involved in the case of Olson v. Armour Co., decided at this term, ante, 272, 280 N.W. 200. In all, four cases were tried and appeal taken by the defendant in each case. Appellant says that the case of Olson v. Armour Co. is typical of all four cases. An examination of the record shows this to be correct. The same points are involved. The amount of damages allowed is the main issue.

This case, therefore, is controlled by the decision in Olson v. Armour Co. and for the reasons set forth in the opinion therein the judgment is affirmed.

CHRISTIANSON, Ch. J., and BURR and NUESSLE, JJ., concur.

MORRIS and SATHRE, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Haugen v. Armour Co.

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Mar 29, 1938
280 N.W. 204 (N.D. 1938)
Case details for

Haugen v. Armour Co.

Case Details

Full title:J.B. HAUGEN, Respondent, v. ARMOUR COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Mar 29, 1938

Citations

280 N.W. 204 (N.D. 1938)
280 N.W. 204

Citing Cases

Viestenz v. Arthur Township

Damages were sought for permanent injuries to the real property and for the annoyance, inconvenience and…

Olson v. Armour Co.

"That there is no showing that plaintiff by reason of his right of occupancy acquired an interest in the…