From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hatmaker v. Advance Mortgage Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 1, 1977
351 So. 2d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-2170.

October 11, 1977. Rehearing Denied December 1, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Victor O. Wehle, J.

Thomas E. Brandt of Law Offices of Donald R. Niles, formerly Tripp Niles, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Peter H. Leavy of Myers, Kaplan, Levinson Kenin, Miami, for appellee.


The plaintiff appeals from a summary final judgment in favor of the defendant.

It is debatable whether, at the time the summary judgment was initially granted, the defendant as the moving party had met its burden of showing that there were no genuine issues of fact. We need not, however, rest our decision on the record before the trial court at the time of the initial hearing. In support of his motion for rehearing the plaintiff filed an affidavit which clearly established the existence of genuine issues of fact; but, the trial court refused to accept the affidavit. After hearing the arguments of counsel on the motion for rehearing the court entered an order denying the motion. We find that the trial court in so doing abused its discretion. Berrol v. Concord Florida, Inc., 305 So.2d 310 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); National Properties, Inc. v. Ballenger Corp., 277 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C.J., CROSS, J., and MILLER, ROBERT P., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Hatmaker v. Advance Mortgage Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 1, 1977
351 So. 2d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Hatmaker v. Advance Mortgage Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON G. HATMAKER, APPELLANT, v. ADVANCE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 1, 1977

Citations

351 So. 2d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Wiskeman v. First Bank of Hollywood

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge. We reverse the summary final judgment entered against Wiskeman upon a holding that…

Pangilinan v. Broward County

However, at the time we decided Sapphire and Bridgeport, the Florida Supreme Court had reached a different…