From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hassane v. Chief Clerk of the N.Y. Cnty. Supreme Court

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 8, 2017
53 N.Y.S.3d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

06-08-2017

Marie Jose CLERMONT, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Sahar ABDELREHIM, et al., Defendants, Chuong Le, M.D., Defendant–Appellant.

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York (Michael J. O'Malley of counsel), for appellant. Jaroslawicz & Jaros PLLC, New York (David Tolchin of counsel), for respondent.


Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York (Michael J. O'Malley of counsel), for appellant.

Jaroslawicz & Jaros PLLC, New York (David Tolchin of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered March 29, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion to strike defendant Chuong Le, M.D.'s affirmative defense based on lack of personal jurisdiction and denied Le's cross motion to dismiss the claims against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks damages for alleged medical malpractice in connection with spinal surgery that rendered her paralyzed from the waist down.

Le waived his lack of service defense by failing to timely move to dismiss, as required by CPLR 3211(e). If Le had never filed an answer, CPLR 3211(e) would not have been implicated and the failure to serve him would have rendered all subsequent proceedings null and void (see Emigrant Mtge. Co., Inc. v. Westervelt, 105 A.D.3d 896, 897, 964 N.Y.S.2d 543 [2d Dept.2013], lv. dismissed

22 N.Y.3d 947, 977 N.Y.S.2d 175, 999 N.E.2d 538 [2013] ). Because he did, thereby appearing in the action, at least on a limited basis (see CPLR 320[b]-[c] ), he was bound to move to dismiss on the ground of lack of service within sixty days of asserting that defense in his answer (see Clermont v. Abdelrehim, 144 A.D.3d 572, 40 N.Y.S.3d 901 [1st Dept. 2016] ; cf. Moustafa v. Jamaica Hosp. Med. Ctr., 304 A.D.2d 539, 540, 758 N.Y.S.2d 120 [2d Dept.2003] ).

Although we reject Le's proposed interpretation of CPLR 3211(e), we nonetheless decline to award sanctions against him.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., GISCHE, KAPNICK, KAHN, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hassane v. Chief Clerk of the N.Y. Cnty. Supreme Court

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 8, 2017
53 N.Y.S.3d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Hassane v. Chief Clerk of the N.Y. Cnty. Supreme Court

Case Details

Full title:In re Chafik HASSANE, Petitioner, v. CHIEF CLERK OF THE NEW YORK COUNTY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 8, 2017

Citations

53 N.Y.S.3d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)