From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvis v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 30, 2018
252 So. 3d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D17-4021

08-30-2018

Isaac J. HARVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. The Order of Revocation of Probation indicates the trial court found Appellant guilty of each of the alleged violations of probation. However, at the evidentiary hearing, the trial court orally pronounced Appellant was found guilty of willfully violating his probation by violating Condition 5, committing a new law violation, Condition 3, changing residence without permission, and Condition 15, failing to remain confined to his approved residence. The trial court found Appellant not-guilty of violating his probation for failing to pay cost of supervision, nor failing to complete community service. Thus, we affirm the convictions and sentences, but remand to the trial court for correction of the scrivener's error. See Cook v. State , 947 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ; Craig v. State , 245 So.3d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). Appellant's presence at such correction is unnecessary.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Rowe and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harvis v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 30, 2018
252 So. 3d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Harvis v. State

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC J. HARVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 30, 2018

Citations

252 So. 3d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Boyce v. State

Appellant need not be present for this ministerial correction to the order. See Wolk v. State, 320 So.3d 230,…

Berry v. State

Appellant need not be present for this ministerial correction to the judgment. SeeWolk v. State , 320 So. 3d…