From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 5, 2006
925 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2D05-5165.

April 5, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; W. Douglas Baird, Judge.


William Harvey appeals the summary denial of his motion for DNA evidence examination filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We affirm the postconviction court's denial of the motion because it is facially insufficient. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Harvey might have to file a timely, facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. See Scarborough v. State, 906 So.2d 379 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

KELLY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Harvey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 5, 2006
925 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Harvey v. State

Case Details

Full title:William HARVEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 5, 2006

Citations

925 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Rosa v. State

The State acknowledges that typically our affirmance of a denial like this would be without prejudice to the…

Powell v. State

Our affirmance is without prejudice to Powell's right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. See,…