From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. Lay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 21, 2013
5:12-cv-00429-SWW-JTK (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

5:12-cv-00429-SWW-JTK

02-21-2013

SIDNEY HARVEY, ADC #081397 PLAINTIFF v. GAYLON LAY, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

2 This dismissal is considered a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of February 2013.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Harvey v. Lay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 21, 2013
5:12-cv-00429-SWW-JTK (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Harvey v. Lay

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY HARVEY, ADC #081397 PLAINTIFF v. GAYLON LAY, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

5:12-cv-00429-SWW-JTK (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2013)