From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 3, 2020
981 F.3d 764 (9th Cir. 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-55907

12-03-2020

HARVEST ROCK CHURCH, INC., itself and on behalf of its member churches in California; Harvest International Ministry, Inc., itself and on behalf of its member churches in California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gavin NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee.

Mathew D. Staver, Horatio G. Mihet, Roger K. Gannam, and Daniel J. Schmid, Liberty Counsel, Orlando, Florida; Nicolai Cocis, Law Office of Nicolai Cocis, Murrieta, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General; Thomas S. Patterson, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Benjamin M. Glickman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; Todd Grabarsky and Seth E. Goldstein, Deputy Attorneys General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, California; for Defendant-Appellee.


Mathew D. Staver, Horatio G. Mihet, Roger K. Gannam, and Daniel J. Schmid, Liberty Counsel, Orlando, Florida; Nicolai Cocis, Law Office of Nicolai Cocis, Murrieta, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Xavier Becerra, Attorney General; Thomas S. Patterson, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Benjamin M. Glickman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; Todd Grabarsky and Seth E. Goldstein, Deputy Attorneys General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, California; for Defendant-Appellee.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States; D.C. No. 2:20-cv-06414-JGB-KK, Central District of California, Los Angeles

Before: Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Supreme Court's order in Harvest Rock Church v. Newsom , No. 20A94, 592 U.S. ––––, ––– S.Ct. ––––, ––– L.Ed.2d ––––, 2020 WL 7061630 (Dec. 3, 2020), we vacate our October 1, 2020, order denying Harvest Rock Church's motion for an injunction pending appeal; vacate the district court's September 2, 2020, order denying Harvest Rock Church's motion for a preliminary injunction; and remand to the district court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo , No. 20A87, 592 U.S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 63, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (Nov. 25, 2020).

Harvest Rock Church's petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. The motions to appear as amicus curiae, filed by Leading Epidemiologists and Public Health Experts (ECF No. 42) and by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, et al. (ECF No. 52), are DENIED as moot.

REMANDED.


Summaries of

Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 3, 2020
981 F.3d 764 (9th Cir. 2020)
Case details for

Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:HARVEST ROCK CHURCH, INC., itself and on behalf of its member churches in…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 3, 2020

Citations

981 F.3d 764 (9th Cir. 2020)

Citing Cases

Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom

My view on that question is unchanged from my dissent from our denial of Harvest Rock Church's first…

Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom

9th Cir. Gen. Order 6.4.b. At this point—and as we are already familiar with many of the issues presented in…