From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haruvi v. Rosen

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department
Dec 29, 2005
10 Misc. 3d 137 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Summary

In Haruvi v Rosen (10 Misc 3d 137[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 52161[U]), the owner's notice alleged only that he intended to vacate his apartment a few blocks away and occupy the tenants' apartment as his primary residence.

Summary of this case from Hirsch v. Stewart

Opinion

December 29, 2005.


Landlord and Tenant — Rent Regulation — Eviction — Owner Occupancy. Rent Stabilization Code — 9 NYCRR 2524.2 (b) (Termination notices; contents).


Summaries of

Haruvi v. Rosen

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department
Dec 29, 2005
10 Misc. 3d 137 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

In Haruvi v Rosen (10 Misc 3d 137[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 52161[U]), the owner's notice alleged only that he intended to vacate his apartment a few blocks away and occupy the tenants' apartment as his primary residence.

Summary of this case from Hirsch v. Stewart
Case details for

Haruvi v. Rosen

Case Details

Full title:HARUVI v. ROSEN

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department

Date published: Dec 29, 2005

Citations

10 Misc. 3d 137 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 52161

Citing Cases

Isdahl v. Pogliani

The specificity requirements of Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2524.2 (b) were not satisfied by…

Hirsch v. Stewart

The court held that the owners' failure to describe the circumstances surrounding their desire to have their…