finding no merit to defendant's argument that he was guilty, at most, of incest and should have been charged with incest instead of rape
Summary of this case from In re KingNo. 485, 2007.
July 14, 2008.
Decisions Without, Published Opinions AFFIRMED.
finding no merit to defendant's argument that he was guilty, at most, of incest and should have been charged with incest instead of rape
Summary of this case from In re KingFull title:Hartman v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Jul 14, 2008
You received a sentence of thirty-three (33) years at Level V incarceration. You represented yourself both at…
In re KingHe could have proceeded to trial and appealed his convictions or sought postconviction review, but did not do…