From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartig v. Brooklands, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1944
268 App. Div. 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

October 16, 1944.

Present — Close, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.


Action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries, and by plaintiff husband for expenses and loss of services. Resettled order setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of defendants and granting a new trial on the ground that the court had committed error in ruling upon evidence, to the prejudice of plaintiffs, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from original order of January 7, 1944, dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Hartig v. Brooklands, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1944
268 App. Div. 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Hartig v. Brooklands, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VERA HARTIG et al., Respondents, v. BROOKLANDS, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Alexander

Where the exact manner of the happening of the accident is related to the diagnosis and treatment for which…

Williams v. Alexander

Where the exact manner of the happening of the accident is related to the diagnosis and treatment for which…