From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harry M. Stevens, Inc. v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 1978
63 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Summary

In Harry M. Stevens, the court held that actions are only duplicative where they involve "the same parties and issues in which plaintiff will have a resolution of the question which he presents here."

Summary of this case from Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. v. Frac Diamond Aggregates LLC

Opinion

June 20, 1978


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 22, 1978, denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and staying the prosecution of the instant action for three months from February 21, 1978, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of granting summary judgment to defendant dismissing the complaint, and, except, as thus modified, affirmed. Defendant in this action commenced suit against plaintiff in Puerto Rico to recover damages for breach of an employment contract. That case is in a relatively advanced stage with issue joined and pretrial discovery proceedings almost completed. Citing section 5-701 (subd a, par 1) of the General Obligations Law, plaintiff, the defendant in that action, thereafter commenced this proceeding seeking a judgment declaring that the oral employment contract, as alleged by the plaintiff in the action in Puerto Rico, is unenforceable inasmuch as it was for a term in excess of one year. The complaint should be dismissed. (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 4.) Where there is no necessity for resorting to the declaratory judgment it should not be employed. (James v Alderton Dock Yards, 256 N.Y. 298, 305.) Another action is pending involving the same parties and issues in which plaintiff will have a resolution of the question which he presents here.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Lupiano, Birns, Silverman and Sullivan, JJ.


Summaries of

Harry M. Stevens, Inc. v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 1978
63 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

In Harry M. Stevens, the court held that actions are only duplicative where they involve "the same parties and issues in which plaintiff will have a resolution of the question which he presents here."

Summary of this case from Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. v. Frac Diamond Aggregates LLC

In Harry M. Stevens, the court held that actions are only duplicative where they involve "the same parties and issues in which plaintiff will have a resolution of the question which he presents here."

Summary of this case from Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. v. Frac Diamond Aggregates LLC
Case details for

Harry M. Stevens, Inc. v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:HARRY M. STEVENS, INC., Appellant, v. RAYMOND MEDINA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1978

Citations

63 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. v. Frac Diamond Aggregates LLC

The case Defendants rely on in support of their argument that the instant action is duplicative of the…

Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. v. Frac Diamond Aggregates LLC

The case Defendants rely on in support of their argument that the instant action is duplicative of the…