From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 23, 1957
297 S.W.2d 823 (Tex. Crim. App. 1957)

Opinion


297 S.W.2d 823 (Tex.Crim.App. 1957) Eugene HARRISON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 28717. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 23, 1957

James E. Faulkner, Coldspring, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, thirty days in jail and a fine of $50.

The complaint alleged that the offense was committed on or about the 26th day of August, 1956. The information based upon the complaint, alleged that the offense was committed on or about the 27th day of August, 1956.

Because of the different dates of the commission of the offense as alleged there is a fatal variance between the complaint and information. 23 Tex.Jur. 604, Sec. 13; 1 Branch's Ann.P.C., 2nd Ed., 456, Sec. 455; Lackey v. State, 53 Tex.Cr.R. 459, 110 S.W. 903; Kelly v. State, 81 Tex.Cr.R. 408, 195 S.W. 853; Bayless v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 123 S.W.2d 354; Murphy v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 269, 193 S.W.2d 820; Dixon v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 626, 279 S.W.2d 868.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.


Summaries of

Harrison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 23, 1957
297 S.W.2d 823 (Tex. Crim. App. 1957)
Case details for

Harrison v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eugene HARRISON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 23, 1957

Citations

297 S.W.2d 823 (Tex. Crim. App. 1957)

Citing Cases

Wheat v. State

It has been consistently held that a variance between the complaint and the information as to the date when…

Peterson v. State

Such a variance between complaint and information is "fatal to the validity of the information — not the…