From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Pandya

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 14, 2010
Case No. 1:09-CV-349 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-CV-349.

July 14, 2010


ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on June 25, 2010. The Report and Recommendation was served on the parties on June 25, 2010. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed June 25, 2010, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 50), which the Court considers as a motion to quash service of process, is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the summonses addressed to Defendants Robert Migliorino, Pragna H. Pandya, and Christine Meyer are QUASHED and the corresponding acknowledgments from "The Corporation Company" (docket nos. 43, 45, and 46) are STRICKEN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall re-issue the summonses for these Defendants for personal service by the United States Marshals Service pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Pandya

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 14, 2010
Case No. 1:09-CV-349 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Harrison v. Pandya

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE LEE HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. PRAGNA H. PANDYA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 14, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:09-CV-349 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

Payne v. Broadworth

Thus, even if Payne is correct that it was the Marshal's Service error that resulted in the ineffective…