From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Crosby

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 13, 1916
104 S.C. 350 (S.C. 1916)

Opinion

9379

April 13, 1916.

Before HON.C.J. RAMAGE, special Judge, October, 1914. Reversed.

Action by C.W. Harrison against S.W. Crosby. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Mr. B.B. Clarke, for appellant, cites: As to presumption in favor of holder as indorsee for value, etc.: 87 S.C. 78; 28 S.C. 143; 32 S.C. 538. Charge: 64 S.C. 509; 77 S.C. 39.

Mr. W.B. de Loach, for respondent, cites: As to circumstantial evidence of holder's bad faith: 91 S.C. 461.


April 13, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


This case is controlled by the decision in Bank v. Stackhouse, 91 S.C. 455, 74 S.E. 977, 40 L.R.A. (N.S.) 454, which has been reaffirmed in numerous cases, some of which are cited in Givens v. Bank, 103 S.C. 174, 86 S.E. 24. See, also, Cannon v. Clarendon Hardware Co., 103 S.C. 538, 88 S.E. 284. The verdict should have been directed for plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS and GAGE concur in the opinion announced.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MR. JUSTICE FRASER did not sit in this case, and did not participate in the decision.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Crosby

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 13, 1916
104 S.C. 350 (S.C. 1916)
Case details for

Harrison v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:HARRISON v. CROSBY

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 13, 1916

Citations

104 S.C. 350 (S.C. 1916)
88 S.E. 1102

Citing Cases

Farr-Barnes Lumber Co. v. Town of St. George

Mr. R. Lon Weeks, for appellant, cites: Error to excludetestimony as to want or failure of consideration…

Merchants Nat. Bank v. Smith et al

Actions by the Merchants National Bank and by Charles W. Hickman against Lloyd H. Smith and others. From a…