From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 17, 1982
414 So. 2d 242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1904.

May 11, 1982. Rehearing Denied June 17, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Herbert M. Klein, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robin H. Greene, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and John F. Robenalt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


As held in Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) and Molina v. State, 406 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), it was improper to admit hearsay evidence as to the basis for the inclusion of the defendant's picture in a photographic lineup. Unlike those cases, however, the in-court identification of the defendant was not severely challenged, and there was no alibi or other defense asserted. It therefore clearly appears from this record that the error was harmless. Section 924.33, Fla. Stat. (1979).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 17, 1982
414 So. 2d 242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLTON HARRIS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 17, 1982

Citations

414 So. 2d 242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

West v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Harris v. State, 414 So.2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Melton v. State, 404 So.2d 798 (Fla.…

Pringle v. State

However, the admission of the hearsay testimony was harmless error in that appellant gave a statement freely…