From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Morrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2008
49 A.D.3d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2969.

March 4, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered March 2, 2007, which denied the motion by defendants Morrison and Dawes to dismiss the complaint as abandoned, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Galvano Xanthakis, P.C., New York (Steven F. Granville of counsel), for appellants.

Rimland Associates, Brooklyn (Anthony M. Grisanti of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


plaintiff showed "sufficient cause . . . why the complaint should not be dismissed" (CPLR 3215 [c]). Acceptance of the excuse offered for the relatively short delay was, under the circumstances, a proper exercise of judicial discretion ( see Pappoe v Custodio, 156 AD2d 211).


Summaries of

Harris v. Morrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2008
49 A.D.3d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Harris v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY J. HARRIS, Respondent, v. FENTON MORRISON et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1853
851 N.Y.S.2d 871

Citing Cases

Santander Bank, N.A. v. 3rd Ward LLC

Although more than a year elapsed between July 1, 2014, and plaintiff's service of this motion October 29,…

JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Re

The reasonable excuse offered is not conclusory or unsubstantiated. The court finds that the plaintiff…