From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. HSBC Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Jul 18, 2012
369 S.W.3d 917 (Tex. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 05–12–00133–CV.

2012-07-18

Herbert HARRIS and All Other Occupants, Appellants, v. HSBC BANK, Appellee.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. CC–11–07824–B, King Fifer, Judge. Herbert Harris Desoto, TX, pro se. Michael W. Zientz, Mackie Wolf & Zientz PC, Dallas, TX, Mark Daniel Hopkins, Hopkins & Williams, PLLC, Austin, TX, Kirby D. Hopkins, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, Houston, TX, Mark Douglas Cronenwett, Higier Allen & Lautin, PC, Addison, for Appellee.


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. CC–11–07824–B, King Fifer, Judge.
Herbert Harris Desoto, TX, pro se. Michael W. Zientz, Mackie Wolf & Zientz PC, Dallas, TX, Mark Daniel Hopkins, Hopkins & Williams, PLLC, Austin, TX, Kirby D. Hopkins, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, Houston, TX, Mark Douglas Cronenwett, Higier Allen & Lautin, PC, Addison, for Appellee.
Before Justices O'NEILL, MARTIN RICHTER, and LANG–MIERS.

OPINION


Opinion By Justice LANG–MIERS.

On May 10, 2012, this Court reinstated this appeal and gave appellants ten days to respond to appellee's March 29, 2012 motion to dismiss. Appellants have not filed a response or otherwise communicated with this Court regarding the appeal.

To invoke this Court's jurisdiction, a party must file a timely notice of appeal. SeeTex.R.App. P. 25.1(b). A notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of the date of judgment if no motion for new trial is filed or within ninety days of the date of judgment if a motion for new trial is filed. SeeTex.R.App. P. 26.1.

The judgment being appealed was signed on December 14, 2011. Because no timely motion for new trial was filed, the notice of appeal was due, at the latest, on January 13, 2012. Appellants filed their notice of appeal on January 23, 2012, ten days past its due date. Appellants have not filed a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal or otherwise explained the delay.

Appellants' notice of appeal failed to invoke this Court's jurisdiction because it was untimely filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. SeeTex.R.App. P. 42.3(a).


Summaries of

Harris v. HSBC Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Jul 18, 2012
369 S.W.3d 917 (Tex. App. 2012)
Case details for

Harris v. HSBC Bank

Case Details

Full title:Herbert HARRIS and All Other Occupants, Appellants, v. HSBC BANK, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

369 S.W.3d 917 (Tex. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Tex. Capital Bank v. Asche

Lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence are separate and discrete concepts. Rothermel v. Duncan,…

Ross v. Spero Holdings, LLC

Thus, Hood does not support appellant's assertion. To invoke this Court's jurisdiction, a party must file a…