From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Harris

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 592
Nov 9, 1959
345 P.2d 1061 (Colo. 1959)

Opinion

No. 18,391.

Decided November 9, 1959.

Proceeding involving custody of minor child in divorce action.

Affirmed.

1. DIVORCE — Appeal and Error — Custodial Orders — Discretion of Court. The established rule in Colorado in custody matters is that the determination thereof rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and where supported by the evidence will not be disturbed.

Error to the District Court of El Paso County, Hon. John M. Meikle, Judge.

Mr. DONALD E. LA MORA, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. BENNETT HEINICKE, Mr. RAYMOND S. DUITCH, for defendant in error.


THIS writ of error seeks to reverse a custodial order entered by the district court of El Paso County, changing the custody of a minor son of the parties from the mother to the father. This cause, therefore, is within the realm of those cases wherein the established rule of this court, as well as other jurisdictions dealing with custody problems, is that custodial orders are within the sound discretion of the trial court. Miller v. Miller, 79 Colo. 609, 247 Pac. 567: Emerson v. Emerson, 117 Colo. 384, 188 P.2d 252.

SOLE QUESTION FOR OUR DETERMINATION.

Are the findings and order supported by the evidence?

This question is answered in the affirmative.

The contentions herein are so similar to those asserted in Searle v. Searle, 115 Colo. 266, 172 P.2d 837, that we need do no more than to call attention to the Searle case to sustain the action of the trial court in the case at bar.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANTZ dissents.


Summaries of

Harris v. Harris

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 592
Nov 9, 1959
345 P.2d 1061 (Colo. 1959)
Case details for

Harris v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:TREVA M. HARRIS v. JOHN F. HARRIS

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 592

Date published: Nov 9, 1959

Citations

345 P.2d 1061 (Colo. 1959)
345 P.2d 1061

Citing Cases

Jensen v. Jensen

There is considerable background evidence which we deem it unnecessary to detail here. Suffice it to say that…

Coulter v. Coulter

In controversies of this nature this Court must of necessity rely on the judgment and discretion of the trial…