From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2001
284 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: June 28, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Yusuf Harris, Attica, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from participating in a planned work stoppage, refusing a direct order and refusing an assigned program. Upon administrative appeal, the charge of refusing an assigned program was dismissed and the penalty imposed was modified. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of guilt on the remaining charges.

We find that the misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Danaher v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 754;Matter of Grant v. Coombe, 240 A.D.2d 784). Petitioner's assertion that he was justified in refusing to leave his cell and report to work based on his expressed fear of retaliation from other inmates presented a credibility issue which the Hearing Officer resolved against him (see,id.). Likewise, we reject petitioner's assertion that he was denied the right to call certain witnesses as the record supports the Hearing Officer's determination that the testimony of those witnesses would have been irrelevant to the charges (see, Matter of Grant v. Coombe, supra). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and, to the extent preserved, found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Harris v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2001
284 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Harris v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of YUSUF HARRIS, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 603

Citing Cases

Robinson v. Lee

We confirm. The misbehavior report and the testimony of its author provide substantial evidence to support…

Leake v. Goord

Contrary to petitioner's assertion, substantial evidence supports the determination of guilt. Petitioner's…