From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Balderama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jan 2, 2018
CASE NO. C16-6054 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 2, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. C16-6054 BHS

01-02-2018

RAY CHARLES HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. MIGUEL BALDERAMA, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable David W. Christel, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 43. The Court having considered the R&R and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED.

(2) Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

(3) Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Dkt. 39) and request that his filing fee be waived (Dkt. 41) are DENIED.

Dated this 2nd day of January, 2018.

/s/_________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Balderama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jan 2, 2018
CASE NO. C16-6054 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Harris v. Balderama

Case Details

Full title:RAY CHARLES HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. MIGUEL BALDERAMA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Jan 2, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. C16-6054 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 2, 2018)