From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. Thomas

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 17, 2007
CIVIL ACTION No. 07-647 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 07-647.

September 17, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2007, upon careful and independent consideration of Harry Harper's pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (docket entry #1), the defendants' response thereto (docket entries #5 and 9), and the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable L. Felipe Restrepo (docket entry #14), to which the parties have not objected, and the Court finding that Judge Restrepo correctly analyzed the exhaustion, timeliness, and due process issues that are at the core of Harper's claims, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED;

3. Harry Harper having made no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, we DECLINE to issue a certificate of appealability; and

4. The Clerk shall CLOSE this civil action statistically.


Summaries of

Harper v. Thomas

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 17, 2007
CIVIL ACTION No. 07-647 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Harper v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:HARRY HARPER v. JOHN THOMAS, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 17, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 07-647 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2007)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Lawler

Similar claims also have been rejected by district courts in this state before. See Harper v. Thomas, 2007 WL…

Reaves v. Wenerowicz

Because the Parole Board thus was not bound by the guilty plea agreement, it did not breach it. See Harper v.…