From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harp v. Malyn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 17, 1990
161 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 17, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Saratoga County (Brown, J.).


Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against defendant John C. Malyn. Malyn's pro se answer was served only nine days late and his explanation that he resides in Arizona and was unable to retain an attorney in New York to represent him in this action constitutes a reasonable excuse for the delay (see, CPLR 3012 [d]). We also find no merit to plaintiff's contention that Supreme Court abused its discretion in dismissing plaintiff's action against Malyn on forum non conveniens grounds. Malyn is a resident of Arizona and all of the alleged tortious conduct occurred in Arizona. Moreover, the dismissal of the same complaint against two other defendants on forum non conveniens grounds has not been appealed by plaintiff and we see no benefit in having this action tried separately in different jurisdictions.

Order affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harp v. Malyn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 17, 1990
161 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Harp v. Malyn

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY J. HARP, Appellant, v. JOHN C. MALYN, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 17, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
557 N.Y.S.2d 500

Citing Cases

Harp v. Malyn

Malyn is not a party to this appeal. We previously affirmed Supreme Court's dismissal of plaintiff's action…

Brooks v. Inn at Saratoga Association

In any event, plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable excuse for the delay. Although she contends that she was…