From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmon Associates v. Primerica Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1992
184 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 18, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


As is clear from the evidence, material questions of fact exist regarding plaintiffs' breach of contract cause of action and breach of fiduciary duty cause of action. Accordingly, summary judgment dismissing those causes of action was properly denied (see, e.g., Millerton Agway Coop. v. Briarcliff Farms, 17 N.Y.2d 57). In addition, we find that the IAS court did not abuse its discretion under the circumstances in denying defendants' motion to amend their answer to assert counterclaims on the ground of laches (see, Smith v. Sarkisian, 63 A.D.2d 780, 781, affd 47 N.Y.2d 878).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Harmon Associates v. Primerica Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1992
184 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Harmon Associates v. Primerica Corporation

Case Details

Full title:HARMON ASSOCIATES et al., Respondents, v. PRIMERICA CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Crimlis v. City of N.Y.

Indeed, BRDY Realty has defended this action under the assumption that plaintiff's claims were the only ones…

Crimlis v. City of New York

Indeed, BRDY Realty has defended this action under the assumption that plaintiff's claims were the only ones…