From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hargus v. Hargus

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two
Oct 14, 1986
717 S.W.2d 869 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 14404.

October 14, 1986.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CAMDEN COUNTY; MARY A. DICKERSON, ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT JUDGE.

W. Gary Drover, Camdenton, for plaintiff-respondent.

William Icenogle, Icenogle Icenogle, Camdenton, for defendant-appellant.


The former husband appeals from a judgment amending a decree of dissolution of marriage. He contends that the trial court erred in restricting his visitation rights with the child of the parties and in awarding attorney's fees to his former wife.

An examination of the record establishes that no error of law appears and that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.


Summaries of

Hargus v. Hargus

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two
Oct 14, 1986
717 S.W.2d 869 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Hargus v. Hargus

Case Details

Full title:REGINA HARGUS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM HARGUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two

Date published: Oct 14, 1986

Citations

717 S.W.2d 869 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Swift v. Leonard

In this connection, we disregard his assumption of obligations incident to his remarriage. Kleine v. Kleine,…

Green v. Green

Even though the decree was based upon a stipulation of the parties, the terms of the stipulation with respect…