From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hare v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 7, 2016
137 S. Ct. 460 (2016)

Summary

finding that Johnson did not apply to petitioner's case, because one of the two underlying charges for which petitioner had received an enhancement under § 924(c) was a drug trafficking crime

Summary of this case from Thomas v. United States

Opinion

No. 16–5348.

11-07-2016

Shane Elliott HARE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.


Petition for rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Hare v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 7, 2016
137 S. Ct. 460 (2016)

finding that Johnson did not apply to petitioner's case, because one of the two underlying charges for which petitioner had received an enhancement under § 924(c) was a drug trafficking crime

Summary of this case from Thomas v. United States
Case details for

Hare v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Shane Elliott HARE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Nov 7, 2016

Citations

137 S. Ct. 460 (2016)
196 L. Ed. 2d 338

Citing Cases

Thomas v. United States

Several other courts have likewise determined that the reasoning in Johnson does not apply to § 924(c)…