From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardy v. Hardy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted February 27, 2001.

March 19, 2001.

In a matrimonial action, Avi J. Kasten appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered May 4, 2000, which, sua sponte, directed him to pay a sanction of $500 to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-2.1.

Avi J. Kasten, Oceanside, N.Y., nonparty-appellant pro se.

Before: Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, SONDRA MILLER, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701[c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is modified, as a matter of discretion, by reducing the amount of the sanction from $500 to $150; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in imposing a sanction upon Avi J. Kasten, attorney for the plaintiff, upon his failure to appear for a scheduled trial, to arrange for substitute counsel to appear, or to advise the court and his adversary of his difficulty in arranging substitute counsel (see, Matter of Gurwitch, 256 A.D.2d 180; 22 NYCRR 130-2.1[b]). However, the sanction is excessive to the extent indicated.


Summaries of

Hardy v. Hardy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Hardy v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:JOYCE L. HARDY, PLAINTIFF, v. ROBERT HARDY, DEFENDANT; AVI J. KASTEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 835

Citing Cases

People v. Dean

The notice of appeal filed by Schlenker from County Court's order is deemed an application for leave to…

Sanchez v. Sanchez

ORDERED that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs. The Supreme Court properly directed the appellant…