Opinion
No. 1D22-700
05-11-2022
Eugene HARDIN, Petitioner, v. HEYL TRUCK LINES, INC., CBCS, Travelers Indemnity Company of America, and Eric M. Christiansen, Respondents.
Eugene Hardin, pro se, Petitioner. Eric M. Christiansen, pro se, Respondent. No appearance for Respondents Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., CBCS, or Travelers Indemnity Company of America.
Eugene Hardin, pro se, Petitioner.
Eric M. Christiansen, pro se, Respondent.
No appearance for Respondents Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., CBCS, or Travelers Indemnity Company of America.
Per Curiam.
The petitioner fails to make out any facial basis for the extraordinary relief he seeks. See State ex rel. Hendricks v. Hunt , 70 So. 2d 301, 306 (Fla. 1954) (dismissing petition because "prohibition is not the proper remedy to correct alleged past abuses but only to forestall an impending, present injury" (internal quotation and citation omitted)); State ex rel. R. C. Motor Lines, Inc. v. Boyd , 114 So. 2d 169, 170 (Fla. 1959) (explaining "that prohibition is a preventive rather than a corrective remedy," and "issues only to prevent the commission of an act," not "to revoke an order already issued"; or putting it differently, prohibition "is used to prohibit the doing of something, rather than to compel the undoing of something already done").
DISMISSED .
Roberts, Osterhaus, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.