From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardesty v. Harlem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 2010
79 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3813.

December 7, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered February 17, 2009, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained when the chair in which plaintiff was sitting collapsed causing him to hit his head against the wall, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Scott A. Wolinetz, P.C., New York (Scott A. Wolinetz of counsel), for appellant.

Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard Smith, LLP, New York (Gregory S. Katz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.


The motion properly found that plaintiff failed to present triable issues of fact for application of the theory of res ipsa loquitur. The record is devoid of evidence that defendant's control of the chair, located in a restaurant open to the public where innumerable patrons had access to the chair, was sufficiently exclusive "to fairly rule out the chance that the defect . . . was caused by some agency other than defendant's negligence" ( Dermatossian v New York City Tr. Auth., 67 NY2d 219, 228; see Loiacono v Stuyvesant Bagels, Inc., 29 AD3d 537; Rivera-Emerling v M. Fortunoff of Westbury Corp., 281 AD2d 215, 217).


Summaries of

Hardesty v. Harlem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 2010
79 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Hardesty v. Harlem

Case Details

Full title:MARK HARDESTY, Appellant, v. SLICE OF HARLEM, II, LLC, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 2010

Citations

79 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9006
911 N.Y.S.2d 624

Citing Cases

Wieland v. Consol. Edison, Inc.

Moreover, the road on which plaintiff fell was not only open to the public but was heavily trafficked. Thus,…

Valentin v. Columbia University

According to the Dessus affidavit relied upon by plaintiff, the alleged defect was readily observable.…