From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanshew v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

March, 1936.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.


Action for personal injuries. The complaint alleges that plaintiff purchased a ticket from defendant Lehigh Valley Railroad Company in the Pennsylvania Station, New York city, for the purpose of proceeding on the Black Diamond Express to Easton, Penn. When she was admitted to the train platform, the doors of the train were closed and the cars dark. About three minutes before the scheduled time for the departure of the train, an employee of defendant Lehigh Valley Railroad Company went through the train putting on the lights in the cars and opening the rear doors only of each car. When said employee reached the front end door of the car at which plaintiff was standing, he passed it by and failed to open it. Immediately thereafter the crowd in which plaintiff was standing made a rush toward the rear door of said car, which had been opened, throwing plaintiff to the stone platform upon which she was standing, with the result that her right leg was broken. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case unanimously affirmed. No opinion.


Summaries of

Hanshew v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Hanshew v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:HELEN IRENE ZEHNER HANSHEW, Appellant, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1936

Citations

247 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Suhre v. Busch

Lydick v. Holland, 83 Mo. 707; Terry v. Michalak, 319 Mo. 301; Frederich v. Union E.L. P. Co., 336 Mo. 1051.…

Cross v. Murray

In our opinion plaintiff's proof was insufficient to raise the question of whether or not the platform was…