From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanover Insurance Company v. Sage

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1986
123 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

October 6, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion granted, and it is declared that plaintiff Hanover Insurance Co. has a duty to defend the defendant Richard Sage in the aforementioned action.

Special Term properly found that there was a factual issue as to whether the claim fell under an exclusionary provision of the respondent's insurance policy. Since it cannot "be concluded as a matter of law that there is no possible factual or legal basis on which [the insurer] might eventually be held to be obligated to indemnify [the insured] under any provision of the insurance policy" (Spoor-Lasher Co. v Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 39 N.Y.2d 875, 876; see also, Seaboard Sur. Co. v Gillette Co., 64 N.Y.2d 304), the insurer has a duty to defend. Thus Special Term erred when it denied the defendant Sage's motion for partial summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff Hanover Insurance Co. had a duty to defend him. Bracken, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hanover Insurance Company v. Sage

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1986
123 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Hanover Insurance Company v. Sage

Case Details

Full title:HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. RICHARD C. SAGE, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1986

Citations

123 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Levy v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co.

Since the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify, a declaration that there is no duty to…

Allstate Insurance Company v. Riggio

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and it is declared that…