From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hannon v. Kiwi Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
No. 3:10-CV-1382-K (N.D. Tex. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-CV-1382-K

01-24-2012

JOHN E. HANNON, Plaintiff, v. KIWI SERVICES, Defendant.


AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and Plaintiff's Objections filed on January 17, 2012, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct except as noted below and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

The Court does not adopt and strikes Magistrate Judge's citations on Page 8, "(citing Rachid v. Jack in the Box, Inc., 376 F.3d 305, 312 (5th Cir. 2004))", and Page 15 "See Rachid, 376 F.3d at 312".

Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrates' Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation are hereby OVERRULED.

SO ORDERED.

______________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hannon v. Kiwi Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
No. 3:10-CV-1382-K (N.D. Tex. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Hannon v. Kiwi Servs.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. HANNON, Plaintiff, v. KIWI SERVICES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-CV-1382-K (N.D. Tex. Jan. 24, 2012)

Citing Cases

BP Exploration & Prod. Inc. v. Cashman Equip. Corp.

On the other hand, the business records exception to the hearsay rule, Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(A), states…