From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hankin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 1, 2005
895 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D04-3263.

February 2, 2005. Rehearing Denied April 1, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Leonard Glick, Judge.

Laurance B. Hankin, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GREEN, and WELLS, JJ.


Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).


Summaries of

Hankin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 1, 2005
895 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Hankin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Laurance B. HANKIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 1, 2005

Citations

895 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)