From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hankerson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 6, 2000
765 So. 2d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D00-1906.

Opinion filed September 6, 2000. JULY TERM 2000

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard I. Wennet, Judge; L.T. No. 97-787CFA02.

Travis Hankerson, Arcadia, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Celia A. Terenzio, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to correct his sentence arguing that his sentence as a habitual violent offender, imposed for a life felony, is illegal based on the unconstitutionality of Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida. That law amended section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1993), to include life felonies as crimes for which habitual offender sentences may be imposed. See Summers v. State, 747 So.2d 987, 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Prior to that amendment, life felonies were not subject to habitualization. We reverse and remand for reconsideration of the sentence under sentencing laws in effect immediately prior to the 1995 amendments. See Lewis v. State, No. 4D00-1753 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 9, 2000).

WARNER, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hankerson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 6, 2000
765 So. 2d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Hankerson v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS HANKERSON, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 6, 2000

Citations

765 So. 2d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Hawkins v. State

However, the weight of authority holds that such claims may properly be raised pursuant to rule 3.800(a). See…

Burgess v. State

GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.Cook v. State, 866 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Hankerson v. State,…