From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 23, 1938
114 S.W.2d 878 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)

Opinion

No. 19254.

Delivered January 19, 1938. State's rehearing denied March 23, 1938.

Murder with Malice.

Companion case to Ascension Martinez, alias "Chon" Martinez, v. The State (page 180 of this volume), and for reasons given in that case judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Appeal from the District Court of Hidalgo County. Hon. Bryce Ferguson, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for murder with malice; penalty, death.

Reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

The opinion states the case.

Kennedy Smith, of Raymondville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder with malice and his punishment was assessed at death.

This is a companion case to that of Ascension Martinez, alias "Chon" Martinez, this day decided, and involves the identical question which was decided by us in that case.

For the reasons given in that case, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON STATE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING.


The question is precisely the same as presented in the State's motion for rehearing in Cause No. 19253, Ascension Martinez, alias "Chon" Martinez, v. State. [Page 180 of this volume.] The same reasons which called for overruling the State's motion in that case demand the same action here.

The State's motion for rehearing is overruled.


Summaries of

Handy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 23, 1938
114 S.W.2d 878 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
Case details for

Handy v. State

Case Details

Full title:PLACIDO HANDY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 23, 1938

Citations

114 S.W.2d 878 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
114 S.W.2d 878

Citing Cases

Parks v. State

KRUEGER, JUDGE. — Appellant, on his motion for rehearing, for the first time contends that he was prosecuted…